Aspen Creek Villas

Worried about traffic on the two-lane Tucson/Olive four-way stop and about overcrowded elementary schools absorbing kids from 350 new homes.

Not against growth, but says the two-lane roads and four-way stop already back up past the creek; all 350 homes' traffic funnels onto Tucson, and Olive won't be widened — it wasn't in the bond package.

Riverstone resident said Tucson Street is already backing up at the four-way stop and 350 new homes would add 400-500 cars before roads are widened; asked the project not move forward until infrastructure catches up.

Riverstone resident raised traffic and school overcrowding concerns and requested time to prepare remarks for the May 19 meeting.

The developer's engineer said they welcome the tabling, noting the PUD already requires the road bond to be fully funded before any final plat and that density was cut from earlier submittals.

Her March letter opposing the project was read into the record, citing two-lane 121st Street congestion, emergency vehicle access, home values, and capacity at Aspen Creek Elementary.

In a letter read into the record, she opposed the development over 121st Street's two-lane condition, emergency access, home values, and Aspen Creek Elementary capacity, noting the project was previously denied by council.

The AAB Engineering representative asked for the continuance, explaining the commission's February feedback called for a more blended project that requires extensive PUD revisions and a site plan still under review.

Co-owner of Little Lynx Golf Course raised flooding concerns — her back nine already floods, the 121st Street culvert is inadequate, and she fears upstream development and the innovation district will push more water onto her business.

Emailed comment strongly opposing approval, citing the overcrowded school, two-lane road traffic, and backups at the 121st and Olive stop sign.