Z-7860 / CPA-131 (RV park rezoning)

Lives beside the property; asked the commission to preserve the historical split between commercial frontage and residential back, citing unresolved sewage, drainage, traffic and maintenance concerns.

Twelve-year resident and landowner who supports developing the commercial frontage but said rezoning the back residential portion 'opens a Pandora's box,' citing the owner's flip listing and lack of feasibility studies.

Owns four nearby houses; worried about noise and traffic and said the neighborhood signed a petition against the rezoning.

A first-time homeowner who grew up in the neighborhood; asked the commission not to rezone the residential area given rising traffic on Edison.

Described $3,000 in storm damage to his house during the owner's land clearing and said the owner skips neighborhood meetings; asked for a plan that reflects neighborhood values.

Left the applicant's neighborhood meeting disheartened; supports development of the commercial frontage but called rezoning the residential rear premature and speculative.

A licensed engineer who opposed rezoning the whole property to CS and suggested a compromise: keep commercial on the arterial frontage and residential on the south side.

The applicant's broker and co-applicant defended Blackmon's 20-year Tulsa record, cited studies that gated RV parks lower crime, and called commercial zoning on arterials the normal pattern of development.