Independent police monitor charter amendment
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 8
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Feb 11, 2026.
Public comments (8)
A Webster High School teacher who cited the $4.5 million wrongful incarceration settlement and $26.25 million Jamerson payout, arguing an independent monitor would save taxpayer money and increase trust.
Council (Regular) - Feb 11, 2026 · 10:48 →Cited over $5 million in recent settlements and the 2024 Equality Indicators report showing Black Tulsans face officer use of force at over nine times the rate of Hispanic residents; urged a robust monitor's office.
Council (Regular) - Feb 11, 2026 · 12:44 →A District 2 resident who said the city paid over $41 million in wrongful conviction settlements last year and urged adoption of the charter amendment for civilian oversight.
Council (Regular) - Feb 11, 2026 · 15:16 →A District 5 taxpayer who detailed settlement cases including an $800,000 payment after officers left a 911 caller who was then assaulted; urged Councilor Gilbert to support the monitor's office.
Council (Regular) - Feb 11, 2026 · 18:04 →A District 4 music volunteer who called the settlement payouts fiscally irresponsible and urged adoption of the independent monitor charter amendment.
Council (Regular) - Feb 11, 2026 · 20:58 →A Muscogee Nation citizen who said Native residents feel fear, not protection, when interacting with police, and said the monitor's office would make her feel safer.
Council (Regular) - Feb 11, 2026 · 22:47 →A school board member who said the office would create accountability and help police serve the community better, referencing accountability failures in federal law enforcement elsewhere.
Council (Regular) - Feb 11, 2026 · 25:30 →Criticized the council for not responding to public speakers and urged councilors to 'act like a world-class city' and listen to the public.
Council (Regular) - Feb 11, 2026 · 28:16 →