Mark A. Nash

Update to The Edmond Plan (Comprehensive Plan)

Cost not yet set — a consultant will be hired through an RFQ process.

Brakes Plus site plan near Santa Fe Avenue

Neighbors cite potential erosion of home values along the unbuffered fence line.

Black Oaks II at Iron Horse Ranch subdivision

Possible data center moratorium

No direct cost, but residents warned future data centers could strain water and electric rates and taxpayers.

Downtown development incentives (Hurd Courts and 19 Broadway)

New hotel rooms would grow lodging tax revenue, which hit $132,000 in June.

Interactive development tracker map

Delaware Creek lot increase to 599 homes

121 additional homes could mean more property tax base but also more demand on roads and schools.

Future use of city-owned downtown properties

Unknown until the separate planning exercise defines improvements.

Sierra Brook preliminary plat and tree preservation variance

Gardenia Apartments neighbors' concerns

Woodland Park VIII drainage conditions

Sierra Brook preliminary plat

Beechgrove Drive drainage concerns at Woodland Park VIII

Unknown — the fix would require developer grading revisions along the affected lots.

Covell-35 Development Incentive Agreement — Legacy at Covell

$17 million from Edmond Electric reserves moved into the incentive account.

Hirn Corner PUD rezoning at 230 E Lincoln Ave

Your property taxes could shift—either up from higher home values or depending on how the city spreads the cost of new roads and schools.

Children of America Daycare Center site plan and specific use permit

Black Oaks II septic system concerns

Liberty Park Phase 1 final plat and variances

The applicant agreed to cover replacement of the non-standard alley when utility maintenance is needed, shifting those costs off the city.

U-Haul storage facility variances

None stated.

Deed certification at Coffee Creek and Coltrane

Lincoln Development preliminary plat (PR26-00018)

Rezone to CBD — Canvas Development, north of W Hurd St (Z26-00021)

8.C — Hurd Courts, LLC development agreement, up to $1M

Consideration of Approval of an Independent Contractor Agreement with B.S. Planning, LLC for Planning and Development Review Services to Support Adoption and Implementation of the Unified Development Code (UDC); Not to Exceed $172,000.00…

103 Broadway, LLC / 18 W Hurd development agreement (8.C and 11.C)

Consideration of Acceptance of Donated Easement from Echo Ranch Development LLC, for 365 West Coffee Creek Road. (Ward 4)

Consideration of Acceptance of Donated Utility Easement from Echo Ranch Development LLC, of Edmond located north-west of Coffee Creek and North Boulevard. (Ward 4)

Reappointment of Rob Garrett to the Edmond Economic Development Authority Board; Term Expires June 30, 2029.

Reappointment of Austin Fugitt to the Edmond Economic Development Authority Board; Term Expires June 30, 2029.

Appointment of Trey Ayers to the Edmond Economic Development Authority Board; Term Expires June 30, 2029.

Consideration of Approval of Agreement with the Edmond Economic Development Authority (EEDA) for Fiscal Year 2026-2027; Not to Exceed $934,284.00. (Citywide)

Case No. Z26-00001; Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval of a Zoning Map Amendment from “PUD Z22-00025” Planned Unit Development to “PUD Z26-00001” Planned Unit Development for Club Car Wash, located on the south side of Covell…

Hutchison Development PUD at Covell and Bryant (Ordinance No. 4084, Z25-00029)

Development Incentive Agreement with Covell-35 Development, LLC

Consideration of Approval of the Assignment of Development and Financing Assistance Agreement for Townsend Courts, LLC for Development of a Mixed-Use Townhouse Neighborhood in Downtown Edmond Located at East 3 rd Street and West of South…

103 Broadway development financing agreement (EPWA 6.C)

103 Broadway development financing agreement (10.G)

Hutchison Development PUD at Covell and Bryant (Ordinance No. 4084, Z25-00029)

Requested developer-neighbor meetings had not occurred until after the Planning Commission meeting, and it was not the neighbors' responsibility to contact the developer.