Sixty-Six Vines PUD
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 13
- Last 30 days
- 13
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 12, 2026.
Public comments (13)
East Edmond acreage owner spoke in support, citing local venue options, manageable traffic, and responsible growth.
City Council / Public Works Authority — October 12, 2026 · 37:30 →Adjoining 40-acre landowner said she learned of the project just that day and asked for time to review engineering, sound, and fire access details.
City Council / Public Works Authority — October 12, 2026 · 41:59 →Bow Pri HOA president learned of the project at 2:30 that afternoon; asked about sound mitigation on the west half and well water impacts on the neighborhood aquifer.
City Council / Public Works Authority — October 12, 2026 · 44:28 →Nearby business owner supported the project with accountability — clear, enforceable conditions on traffic, noise, and hours.
City Council / Public Works Authority — October 12, 2026 · 46:05 →Nearby owner described illegal rifle hunting, people living in RVs, and noise on the property now, saying current conditions undermine confidence in the 'upscale' promise.
City Council / Public Works Authority — October 12, 2026 · 48:42 →Resident just north of the venue detailed privacy, noise, trespassing visitors blocking her driveway, and demanded enforceable written sound, parking, and operations standards.
City Council / Public Works Authority — October 12, 2026 · 53:02 →Thirty-year Edmond teacher supported the project, citing career-learning partnerships for his Boulevard Academy students and past growth patterns in East Edmond.
City Council / Public Works Authority — October 12, 2026 · 1:00:01 →Wedding florist said the venue would keep Oklahoma wedding dollars local and support 15-20 small businesses per event.
City Council / Public Works Authority — October 12, 2026 · 1:05:49 →Longtime property owner to the south opposed, citing noise, decibel uncertainty, traffic on Westminster, parking, water supply, and property value impacts; was cut off by the mayor for going beyond the zoning scope.
City Council / Public Works Authority — October 12, 2026 · 1:13:38 →Edmond resident and engaged supporter who hopes to marry at the venue; cited economic growth and low-impact design.
City Council / Public Works Authority — October 12, 2026 · 1:31:00 →Recent mother-of-the-bride said her own 400-person wedding produced only ~100 cars and quiet orchestra music; supported the venue.
City Council / Public Works Authority — October 12, 2026 · 1:32:43 →Service-industry worker described the surge in bartending and event jobs the venue would create.
City Council / Public Works Authority — October 12, 2026 · 1:34:34 →East Edmond homeowner and hospitality/baking professional spoke briefly in favor.
City Council / Public Works Authority — October 12, 2026 · 1:36:00 →