Development
Legacy at Covell incentive
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Supportive (5)Opposed (1)Concerned (1)
At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 23, 2026.
Public comments (7)
SupportiveJeff StokesMar 23, 2026
A local resident spoke in favor of the proposed Covell development.
City Council / Public Works Authority — March 23, 2026 · 0:00 →ConcernedLori Dickinson BlackMar 23, 2026
A small business owner who supports the development but worries about the Barnes and Noble incentive hurting local bookstores.
City Council / Public Works Authority — March 23, 2026 · 0:00 →SupportiveTodd McKinnisMar 23, 2026
The developer's representative answered questions and agreed to seek a substitute retailer in place of the Barnes and Noble incentive.
City Council / Public Works Authority — March 23, 2026 · 0:00 →SupportiveTaylor WilsonMar 23, 2026
Expressed appreciation for the prior workshop on the item.
City Council / Public Works Authority — March 23, 2026 · 0:00 →OpposedCharles MullsMar 23, 2026
Raised concerns about the Barnes and Noble incentive and impacts on local businesses.
City Council / Public Works Authority — March 23, 2026 · 0:00 →SupportiveCody BoydMar 23, 2026
Supported the project, citing money already spent on Covell for economic development.
City Council / Public Works Authority — March 23, 2026 · 0:00 →SupportiveSusan StarnsMar 23, 2026
A small business owner who backed the project for its potential economic impact.
City Council / Public Works Authority — March 23, 2026 · 0:00 →