Oklahoma Record
Edmond
Zoning

Data center moratorium

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (3)Opposed (4)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
8
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 8, 2026.

Public comments (8)

ConcernedAndrew FleetJun 8, 2026

Founded an OSU data center research committee and asked whether any future approval would require a fully funded cost-benefit analysis covering water, energy, and property values.

City Council / Public Works Authority — June 8, 2026 · 1:23:43 →
SupportiveJeff StokesJun 8, 2026

Went against the crowd — argued data centers could bring tax revenue and that oilfield-produced water could be cleaned for their use.

City Council / Public Works Authority — June 8, 2026 · 1:25:21 →
OpposedAngela HartmannJun 8, 2026

Opposed data centers over 24-hour noise and said she'd support a full ban, not just a moratorium.

City Council / Public Works Authority — June 8, 2026 · 1:27:08 →
SupportiveConnie ThayerJun 8, 2026

Called the discussions about facts not fear, urged a yes vote, and asked for a citizen advisory board during the study period.

City Council / Public Works Authority — June 8, 2026 · 1:28:31 →
SupportiveWendy DialJun 8, 2026

With a geology background, warned about PFAS 'forever chemicals' in data center water systems and asked for full public accounting of any incentives.

City Council / Public Works Authority — June 8, 2026 · 1:31:23 →
OpposedJon AidensJun 8, 2026

Raised eminent domain concerns discussed at a Luther meeting of several hundred residents.

City Council / Public Works Authority — June 8, 2026 · 1:35:00 →
OpposedDavid HennesyJun 8, 2026

Cited infrasound noise harms in a Michigan town and urged a citizen petition and a much longer moratorium.

City Council / Public Works Authority — June 8, 2026 · 1:36:00 →
OpposedCarol RollsJun 8, 2026

First-time attendee flagged data collection and privacy concerns and connected aquifer impacts across cities.

City Council / Public Works Authority — June 8, 2026 · 1:37:29 →