Data center moratorium
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 8
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 8, 2026.
Public comments (8)
Founded an OSU data center research committee and asked whether any future approval would require a fully funded cost-benefit analysis covering water, energy, and property values.
City Council / Public Works Authority — June 8, 2026 · 1:23:43 →Went against the crowd — argued data centers could bring tax revenue and that oilfield-produced water could be cleaned for their use.
City Council / Public Works Authority — June 8, 2026 · 1:25:21 →Opposed data centers over 24-hour noise and said she'd support a full ban, not just a moratorium.
City Council / Public Works Authority — June 8, 2026 · 1:27:08 →Called the discussions about facts not fear, urged a yes vote, and asked for a citizen advisory board during the study period.
City Council / Public Works Authority — June 8, 2026 · 1:28:31 →With a geology background, warned about PFAS 'forever chemicals' in data center water systems and asked for full public accounting of any incentives.
City Council / Public Works Authority — June 8, 2026 · 1:31:23 →Raised eminent domain concerns discussed at a Luther meeting of several hundred residents.
City Council / Public Works Authority — June 8, 2026 · 1:35:00 →Cited infrasound noise harms in a Michigan town and urged a citizen petition and a much longer moratorium.
City Council / Public Works Authority — June 8, 2026 · 1:36:00 →First-time attendee flagged data collection and privacy concerns and connected aquifer impacts across cities.
City Council / Public Works Authority — June 8, 2026 · 1:37:29 →