Oklahoma Record
Edmond
Development

Brakes Plus site plan

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (4)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
5
Last 30 days
0

Discussed at 2 meetings in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 28, 2026.

Public comments (10)

OpposedVictor CarneiroSep 28, 2026

Said the shop would sit directly behind his home with no buffer or road between, bringing noise, traffic, and lower property values; noted the applicant never contacted neighbors until days before the meeting.

City Council / Public Works Authority — September 28, 2026 · 3:00 →
OpposedTodd OlberdingSep 28, 2026

Studied 24 Edmond auto shops and found the typical distance to homes is about 330 feet — this one would be just 50 feet from a house.

City Council / Public Works Authority — September 28, 2026 · 10:01 →
OpposedRhonda CarneiroSep 28, 2026

Recorded audio at another Brakes Plus — horn honking, bells, music audible from 30 feet, open bay doors — plus concerns about smells, chemicals, and cameras near backyards.

City Council / Public Works Authority — September 28, 2026 · 11:31 →
OpposedLori FornelSep 28, 2026

Lives right next door and learned about the project only when a neighbor told her; stressed how close the shop would be to her backyard.

City Council / Public Works Authority — September 28, 2026 · 15:31 →
OpposedLydia LeeSep 28, 2026

Argued the Planning Commission already rejected this and applicants don't get a do-over — urged the council to deny.

City Council / Public Works Authority — September 28, 2026 · 17:09 →
OpposedVictor CuneroSep 8, 2026

Bradford Place resident of nearly 40 years asked the commission to deny the plan, citing compressor and tool noise, traffic at the neighborhood entrance, unbuffered light bays and chemical odors against backyards, and property-value erosion.

Planning Commission — September 8, 2026 · 1:14:16 →
OpposedTodd OberdingSep 8, 2026

Played a recording of brake-shop noise and urged denial, asking for study of hours, noise, lighting, and odor controls.

Planning Commission — September 8, 2026 · 42:44 →
OpposedRhonda CanaroSep 8, 2026

Also of 2317 Bradford Place; shared a backyard video of existing noise and asked that the plan be denied as proposed.

Planning Commission — September 8, 2026 · 44:08 →
OpposedDan O'NeillSep 8, 2026

Argued the site triggers D-2 sensitive-border standards requiring a 70-foot residential buffer the plan doesn't meet, and urged denial of the driveway variance to preserve the corridor's planned connectivity.

Planning Commission — September 8, 2026 · 47:08 →
ConcernedFrancis SnellSep 8, 2026

A 26-year Orchard resident concerned about adequate parking for inoperable or overnight vehicles on the narrow site, and about hours of operation.

Planning Commission — September 8, 2026 · 56:26 →