Elysian Fields III
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Elysian Fields III PUD amendment→At a glance
- Public comments
- 1
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Feb 26, 2026.
Public comments (6)
The adjoining property owner asked the commission to hold the PUD to its existing 182-home cap, arguing the city has already granted enough relief and that raising density walks back earlier commitments made after strong public input.
Planning Commission - Feb 26, 2026 · 18:02 →Emailed comment urging the area stay purely residential, objecting to commercial traffic near a park and homes.
Planning Commission - Feb 26, 2026 · 24:27 →Emailed comment from a long-time resident opposing business operations next to residential areas at Garnett and Tucson.
Planning Commission - Feb 26, 2026 · 24:37 →Emailed comment asking that the neighborhood remain a quiet place to live, not converted to businesses.
Planning Commission - Feb 26, 2026 · 24:47 →Emailed comment from an Alysian Fields resident voting against the RS-to-commercial change, citing traffic, noise, refuse, and the loss of one of the last rural, wildlife-rich areas.
Planning Commission - Feb 26, 2026 · 25:30 →Signed up to speak but declined, saying her questions had already been answered.
Planning Commission - Feb 26, 2026 · 17:28 →