County Line Crossing final plat
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 10, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Applicant's representative said engineering reviews are standard and on track, with an approved earth change permit and construction underway; agreed with staff report.
Planning Commission - Sep 10, 2026 · 6:24 →Asked for a 50-foot greenbelt buffer, said no one ever answered her request, objected to any access across her land, and worried stormwater will wash out property her family has held for 60-plus years.
Planning Commission - Sep 10, 2026 · 15:33 →Said the developer clear-cut the front of the property and urged preserving the remaining 50-foot tree line; asked the commission to keep the greenbelt so neighbors don't see the new homes.
Planning Commission - Sep 10, 2026 · 18:21 →Says PSO's ownership of the land raises constitutional questions, and that runoff from Seven Oaks already floods his property and his neighbors'; asked the commission to protect residents before approving the plat.
Planning Commission - Sep 10, 2026 · 22:02 →Questioned the $10-to-$2.2-million PSO land sale and told the commission it works for the people and should listen to neighbors who oppose the project.
Planning Commission - Sep 10, 2026 · 27:46 →A health coach from Seven Oaks cited research linking mature tree canopy to public health and asked the city to preserve green space and choose quality growth over quantity.
Planning Commission - Sep 10, 2026 · 30:30 →Signed up to speak but only wished to state his opposition without remarks.
Planning Commission - Sep 10, 2026 · 32:35 →